A lot of slides with a lot of content which is poorly explained and motivated in my opinion. Along the individual lectures there is a lot of repetition, as if each of them was separately conceived instead of creating an interesting path through the course contents. A huge focus is on potential products, which are however just presented, without clearly giving their differences and unique usage scenarios. Quizzes/tests contain strangely formulated answers which lack clear identification of the correct answer. In total, the modules provide relevant and useful information, but presentation and motivation is quite not optimal. I feel that I could have learnt this in far less time, and my interest for the topic could be elevated much higher.

I encountered the following popped-up error message upon completion of the the Practice Assignment in Module 2, and the Assignment was not scored: "Course Staff has disabled viewing feedback for this assignment." Please help.

Labs do not always work and I found the material to be very terse

cdsc

Seems like it's made by AI. Questions are not very well formulated and so you can't really tell which answer is correct (sometimes there are actual mistakes in the questions). Also, big parts of the content are not really relevant (like name of tools that do very specific AI powered things). And then you also have questions in the quizzes that require you to choose company names, which is quite stupid.

I suppose this course is poorely generated by AI. Whole course feels like reading and listening to a washing-machine instruction. It overviews the usage of AI in every part of the software development cycle, but if you chat with chatGPT about this for an hour - it will give you better overview. The idea of the course it's good itself, hopefully someone else implements it better.

Bad final exercise, it does not work properly and there is no support.